Recognises a management KPI under a regulatory name
Shares the name, not the definition.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 64% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 30% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 60% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 56% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: Agreement with the regulatory definition or a new name
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: KP-002 excludes forborne exposures that are non-performing under EBA Acceptable: Agrees with EBA or renamed
Also known as: Management KPI under a regulatory name
Related knobits
Builds on
Usually followed by
All 19 knobits of Define metrics and KPIs.
Source: Review checklist 02-metric-definitions, row 7 (EBA)