Recognises mixed and-or without precedence in a rule
Precedence is undefined, so two readings are both defensible.
Can AI do this?
AI does this well Most of the tested AI models master this. 9 of 10 models master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.1-pro-preview | Flagship | 99% | Mastered |
| gpt-6-astra | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| claude-fable-5-1 | Flagship | 99% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.8-flash | Mid tier | 99% | Mastered |
| gpt-6.1-sol | Mid tier | 100% | Mastered |
| claude-sonnet-5-5 | Mid tier | 99% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 44% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 100% | Mastered |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 99% | Mastered |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The two readings and the parenthesised one intended
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: "Each account must specify an IBAN and a branch or an account holder" Acceptable: Split into two rules, or parenthesise: "...an IBAN and (a branch or an account holder)" (RUL-021)
Also known as: "and" with "or" in one clause (data rule)
Related knobits
Builds on
All 28 knobits of Document data rules as SBVR fact types and rule statements.
Source: Review checklist 03-data-rules, row 17