Recognises actual and plan without distinct notation
Scenarios in the same colour and style.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 60% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 61% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 60% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 64% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: IBCS scenario notation
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: PN-03 actual and plan both solid blue Acceptable: Actual solid, plan outlined (IBCS notation)
Also known as: Actual and plan not distinguished
Related knobits
Builds on
All 14 knobits of Specify reports and dashboards.
Source: Review checklist 05-report-specification, row 7 (IBCS (unify))