Recognises a reconciliation passing on offsetting differences
Reconciled at a level where differences cancel.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 73% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 44% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 43% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 76% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The per-account differences
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: Total within 0.1%: +€2.1M on 2010, −€2.0M on 2020 Acceptable: Per GL account, each within tolerance or explained
Also known as: Offsetting differences passing
Related knobits
Builds on
Usually followed by
All 14 knobits of Populate the warehouse and reconcile it.
Source: Review checklist 04-population-reconciliation, row 5 (BCBS 239 P3)