Recognises point in time and period confused
A balance metric without its time semantics, or mixing them.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 64% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 57% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 64% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 61% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The time semantics the metric means
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: KP-001 NPL uses quarter-average balances for "NPL at quarter-end" Acceptable: Quarter-end balances, stated
Also known as: Point in time and period confused
Related knobits
Builds on
All 19 knobits of Define metrics and KPIs.
Source: Review checklist 02-metric-definitions, row 2 (Kimball)