Recognises a grading reason citing no evidence
A reason that does not cite what the answer contains or lacks.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 83% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 83% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 35% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 83% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: A reason citing what the answer contains or lacks
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: "Good work." Acceptable: "States 1,260 / 3,000 = 42%: all three payments included"
Also known as: Reason that points to nothing
Related knobits
Builds on
Usually followed by
All 16 knobits of Grade answers against a rubric.
Source: Review checklist 03-answer-grading, row 8 (Standards 6)