Skilirium

Recognises a cap on a peripheral criterion

T-206 · Skill knobit · Activity: Write and review test items · Competence: Skill assessment

A cap on a criterion that is not the point of the test.

Can AI do this?

AI does this well Most of the tested AI models master this. 3 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.

ModelTierProbability of masteryStatus
gemini-4-argonFlagship 94%Mastered
gemini-3.5-flash-liteLow cost 54%Not shown
gpt-6-lunaLow cost 94%Mastered
claude-haiku-5-5Low cost 94%Mastered

Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.

What it looks like in practice

Expected result: The cap on the central criterion

How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: when_zero: Q1 (the word limit), max_total: 4 Acceptable: The cap on the criterion without which the task is missed

Also known as: Cap that guards no construct

Related knobits

Builds on

All 15 knobits of Write and review test items.

Source: Review checklist 02-test-items, row 6 (Practice)