Recognises restricted reads not logged
Restricted columns read with no read event logged.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 65% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 67% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 66% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 68% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The reads and the logging they need
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: card.pan reads by the card service not logged Acceptable: Read events for restricted columns, at least by role
Also known as: Reads of restricted data not logged
Related knobits
Builds on
All 16 knobits of Monitor and audit access.
Source: Review checklist 05-monitoring-audit, row 9 (PCI 10.2.1.1; 27002 8.15)