Recognises a shared privileged account
A privileged account not tied to one person.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 76% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 73% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 74% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 75% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The account and personal or non-interactive replacements
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: RL-009 SVC_REPORTING, interactive login shared by the BI team, with admin Acceptable: Personal accounts; service account non-interactive, least privilege
Also known as: Shared or generic privileged account
Related knobits
Builds on
All 20 knobits of Design access control.
Source: Review checklist 03-access-control, row 11 (27002 5.16, 8.2)