Recognises regulated data outside its requirement's scope
A copy of regulated data in a data set the requirement does not list.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 81% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 38% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 82% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 83% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The copy, the data set and the requirement whose scope it enters
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: PAN copied into the legacy warehouse (DS-007) for card spend reporting; RQ-004 scope [DS-004] Acceptable: DS-007 in PCI scope with its jobs, readers and backups - or the PAN removed or truncated there
Also known as: Regulated data outside the requirement's scope
Related knobits
Builds on
Usually followed by
All 17 knobits of Register regulatory security requirements.
Source: Review checklist 01-regulatory-requirements, row 8 (PCI scope; DMBOK)