Recognises a match rule on a field a source lacks
A rule needs an identifier missing in some sources.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 79% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 45% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 78% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 79% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The rule scoped to sources holding the field
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: MR-002 personal code exact for card-system records, which have no personal code Acceptable: Rule scoped to sources that hold it
Also known as: Rule on a field a source does not hold
Related knobits
Builds on
All 16 knobits of Define the matching rules.
Source: Review checklist 03-matching, row 7 (DMBOK)