Recognises duplicate evaluation criteria
Two criteria measure the same requirement and count it twice.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 38% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 48% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 48% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 79% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The defect named on the two criteria measuring one thing, and its fix or the question for its owner
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: EC-007 Licence cost and EC-008 Total cost of ownership Acceptable: One cost criterion (TCO)
Also known as: Duplicate criteria
Related knobits
Builds on
All 14 knobits of Evaluate data storage technology.
Source: Review checklist 01-technology-evaluation, row 9 (MCDA)