Recognises an event threshold with no rationale
A threshold with nothing saying why it is set there.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 82% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 82% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 82% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 82% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The threshold and its rationale
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: ER-001 large transfer > EUR 15 000, rationale: null Acceptable: "Risk appetite statement 2026; 95th percentile of retail transfers"
Also known as: Threshold with no rationale
Related knobits
Builds on
All 15 knobits of Set event thresholds and alerts.
Source: Review checklist 06-event-thresholds, row 1 (DMBOK; EBA)