Recognises an impacted object missed through a manual step
An object reached through a spreadsheet or re-keying step missing from the analysis.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 89% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 89% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 82% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 89% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The manual step and the objects past it, with their owners
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: IA-001 omits CE-041 (Treasury workbook) and CE-051 (COREP C 73.00, 5 hops) Acceptable: Both listed: workbook and return restated, Head of Treasury and Head of Regulatory Reporting notified
Also known as: Object missed through a manual step
Related knobits
Builds on
- M-651 Explains impact analysis as the downstream closure of lineage
- M-554 Explains BCBS 239 requirements on lineage and manual steps
All 9 knobits of Analyse the impact of a change.
Source: Review checklist 06-impact-analysis, row 3 (BCBS 239 P3, P6)