Recognises a manual step missing from a lineage path
A spreadsheet, e-mail or re-keying step missing from the path, shown as an automated edge.
Can AI do this?
People still lead Few or none of the tested AI models showed they master this. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 89% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 89% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 9% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 89% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The path through the manual step, its edges manual, with its owner
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: LG-010 CE-031 → CE-051 automated; Treasury workbook CE-041 catalogued but on no path Acceptable: CE-031 → CE-041 → CE-051, both manual, owner Head of Treasury
Also known as: Manual step not represented
Related knobits
Builds on
- M-554 Explains BCBS 239 requirements on lineage and manual steps
- M-255 Explains the PROV-O provenance model
All 11 knobits of Trace column-level lineage.
Source: Review checklist 05-lineage, row 3 (BCBS 239 P3 (manual steps documented); PROV (activity))