Recognises a glossary term class unable to hold the term unchanged
The term class missing or renaming the glossary's id, definition, steward or trace links, or letting the catalogue rewrite them.
Can AI do this?
People still lead Few or none of the tested AI models showed they master this. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 89% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 6% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 88% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 10% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: A term class holding id, definition, steward and trace links read-only
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: MC-001 holds name and description (owner: catalogue administrator); no trace links Acceptable: id, definition (owner: steward), steward, trace_links, read-only
Also known as: Glossary term not holdable unchanged
Related knobits
Builds on
All 12 knobits of Design the metamodel.
Source: Review checklist 02-metamodel, row 4 (data-modelling contract; 11179-3 (designation and definition))