Skilirium

Recognises a check expression unable to run

K-717 · Skill knobit · Activity: Derive data quality rules · Competence: Data modelling

An expression in logical names or business terms rather than physical column names, in another dialect's syntax, or reading columns the rule does not cite. It either errors — and an erroring check is often counted as passing — or runs against something else.

Can AI do this?

AI does this well Most of the tested AI models master this. 9 of 10 models master it.

ModelTierProbability of masteryStatus
gemini-4-argonFlagship 100%Mastered
gemini-3.1-pro-previewFlagship 100%Mastered
gpt-6-astraFlagship 100%Mastered
claude-fable-5-1Flagship 100%Mastered
gemini-3.8-flashMid tier 99%Mastered
gpt-6.1-solMid tier 99%Mastered
claude-sonnet-5-5Mid tier 99%Mastered
gemini-3.5-flash-liteLow cost 100%Mastered
gpt-6-lunaLow cost 77%Not shown
claude-haiku-5-5Low cost 100%Mastered

Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.

What it looks like in practice

Expected result: The expression and its runnable physical form

How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: "Makse summa" <= "Kontojääk" against a table whose columns are makse_summa and kontojaak; or Postgres ~ regex on a Snowflake target Acceptable: makse_summa <= kontojaak, with both columns in columns; dialect-specific syntax noted in comment (DQR-010, DQR-020)

Also known as: Expression that cannot run (data quality rule)

Related knobits

Builds on

All 31 knobits of Derive data quality rules.

Source: Review checklist 07-dq-rules, row 17; DMBOK2; this skill