Explains warrant for vocabulary terms
Literary, user and organisational warrant justifying a node.
Can AI do this?
AI does this well Most of the tested AI models master this. 7 of 10 models master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.1-pro-preview | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| gpt-6-astra | Flagship | 50% | Not shown |
| claude-fable-5-1 | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.8-flash | Mid tier | 100% | Mastered |
| gpt-6.1-sol | Mid tier | 50% | Not shown |
| claude-sonnet-5-5 | Mid tier | 100% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 91% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 100% | Mastered |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 100% | Mastered |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: Literary, user and organisational warrant justifying a node
How it is assessed: States the warrant of sample nodes or finds its absence
Related knobits
Needed for
All 31 knobits of Build the conceptual model and taxonomies.
Source: Data-management practice used by the stage 4 reference and review checklist