Recognises contradicting data rules
Two rules on one fact type cannot both hold. Almost always a missing condition: one rule applies to a subtype and nobody wrote that down.
Can AI do this?
AI does this well Most of the tested AI models master this. 7 of 10 models master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.1-pro-preview | Flagship | 84% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-astra | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| claude-fable-5-1 | Flagship | 100% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.8-flash | Mid tier | 100% | Mastered |
| gpt-6.1-sol | Mid tier | 100% | Mastered |
| claude-sonnet-5-5 | Mid tier | 100% | Mastered |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 30% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 34% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 100% | Mastered |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The rule pair and the missing condition
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: BR-1: each account has exactly one interest rate and BR-2: it is prohibited that an account has an interest rate Acceptable: BR-1: each savings account has exactly one interest rate; BR-2: it is prohibited that a current account has an interest rate — the condition is in the rule, not in somebody's memory (ANO-001)
Also known as: Contradiction (data rule)
Related knobits
Builds on
Usually followed by
All 28 knobits of Document data rules as SBVR fact types and rule statements.
Source: Review checklist 03-data-rules, row 1