Skilirium

Recognises a guess recorded as fact

K-119 · Skill knobit · Activity: Capture data requirements · Competence: Data modelling

A gap in the source filled with a plausible value and no open_question. Also: a requirement reverse-engineered from an existing schema or sample data, recorded as a business need.

Can AI do this?

AI does this well Most of the tested AI models master this. 8 of 10 models master it.

ModelTierProbability of masteryStatus
gemini-4-argonFlagship 100%Mastered
gemini-3.1-pro-previewFlagship 0%Not shown
gpt-6-astraFlagship 100%Mastered
claude-fable-5-1Flagship 100%Mastered
gemini-3.8-flashMid tier 94%Mastered
gpt-6.1-solMid tier 100%Mastered
claude-sonnet-5-5Mid tier 100%Mastered
gemini-3.5-flash-liteLow cost 0%Not shown
gpt-6-lunaLow cost 100%Mastered
claude-haiku-5-5Low cost 100%Mastered

Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.

What it looks like in practice

Expected result: The guessed content and the open question it should be

How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: "Payment references are unique." taken from a unique index in the legacy database, stakeholder: Payments Ops, status: confirmed Acceptable: source.document: "existing system: PAYMENTS_DB DDL", status: draft, rationale: "describes current behaviour, not confirmed as a business need", plus an open_question for Payments Ops.

Also known as: Guess recorded as fact (data requirement)

Related knobits

Builds on

All 47 knobits of Capture data requirements.

Source: Review checklist 01-requirements, row 19; Stage 1 (record what you did not get)