Recognises an issue routed below the level with authority
A cross-domain dispute owned by one of the two domain owners, who has no authority over the other.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 51% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 52% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 52% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 51% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The issue and the body with authority
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: GI-006 Chargeback definition (Cards vs Payments), owner: RO-006 Payment data owner Acceptable: owner: GB-001, decision_type: DC-004; both owners consulted
Also known as: Routed below authority
Related knobits
Builds on
- G-551 Explains routing governance issues to the lowest level with authority
- G-252 Explains decision rights and the escalation ladder
All 20 knobits of Manage and escalate governance issues.
Source: Review checklist 05-issue-management, row 5 (DCAM)