Recognises a reference to a principle outside the scope
A control cites a principle ID that is not in the list in scope. Either a typo or a principle nobody assessed.
Can AI do this?
People still lead Few or none of the tested AI models showed they master this. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 60% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 5% | Not mastered |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 55% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 60% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The control and the dangling reference
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: CT-008 addresses: [RP-011, RP-014]; there is no RP-014 Acceptable: addresses: [RP-011]; P12–P14 are addressed to supervisors
Also known as: Dangling principle reference
Related knobits
Builds on
All 21 knobits of Map BCBS 239 to controls.
Source: Review checklist 04-regulatory-mapping, row 15 (BCBS)