Recognises a policy implementing no principle
The policy has no reason in the strategy; nobody can argue for it when it is inconvenient.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 83% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 83% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 83% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 84% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The policy and the principle it serves
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: PO-005, principles: [] Acceptable: Cites the principle it implements, or the strategy gains a principle the council agrees
Also known as: Policy implementing no principle
Related knobits
Builds on
All 26 knobits of Write governance policies, standards and procedures.
Source: Review checklist 03-policies-standards, row 3 (38505 direct; DMBOK)