Recognises a policy with no scope
Nobody can tell whether a case is covered.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 82% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 83% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 83% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 84% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The policy and the scope to state
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: PO-005 Records retention policy, scope: null Acceptable: "All records created by Bank AS in the course of its retail banking business, in any medium."
Also known as: Policy with no scope
Related knobits
Builds on
All 26 knobits of Write governance policies, standards and procedures.
Source: Review checklist 03-policies-standards, row 2 (DMBOK; DCAM)