Recognises a decision type in two bodies' mandates
One decision type in two bodies' decides. The requester chooses the friendlier forum.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 65% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 66% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 65% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 67% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The decision type and the one body, or the split
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: DC-004 in both GB-001.decides and GB-003.decides Acceptable: One body; or split into "cross-domain business definitions" (GB-001) and "risk data aggregation controls" (GB-003)
Also known as: Mandate overlap
Related knobits
Builds on
All 26 knobits of Design the governance operating model and stewardship.
Source: Review checklist 02-operating-model, row 18 (DCAM)