Recognises a decision type with no or two deciders
A decision type with decider: null, or a list. Either nobody decides or it depends who you ask first.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 66% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 66% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 66% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 66% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The decision type and its one decider
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: DC-005 Accept a DQ threshold, decider: null; DC-004 Settle a cross-domain dispute, decider: [GB-001, GB-003] Acceptable: Exactly one role or body; split the decision type if two kinds of case really need two deciders
Also known as: Decision with no decider, or two
Related knobits
Builds on
All 26 knobits of Design the governance operating model and stewardship.
Source: Review checklist 02-operating-model, row 6 (DCAM; RAM)