Recognises a custodian as a domain owner
An IT role owns a business domain — contradicts "data is owned in the business" and puts definitions with people who do not create the data.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 60% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 55% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 53% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 54% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The domain and the business owner role
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: DD-002 Account, owner: RO-021 Core banking application manager Acceptable: owner: RO-002 Account data owner (Head of Daily Banking); RO-021 custodian
Also known as: Custodian as owner
Related knobits
Builds on
All 26 knobits of Design the governance operating model and stewardship.
Source: Review checklist 02-operating-model, row 5 (DMBOK; 38505 responsibility)