Recognises a proposed object presented as agreed
An object with status: approved and no source — written by a drafter (or Claude) to fill a gap and recorded as if someone had agreed it. The review never looks at it, because it does not look new.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 59% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 42% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 59% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 56% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The object and the missing source
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: DP-008 ... status: approved, source: null Acceptable: status: proposed until the owner or the council agrees it; then approved with the meeting as source
Also known as: Proposed presented as agreed
Related knobits
Builds on
All 25 knobits of Set the data strategy and principles.
Source: Review checklist 01-strategy-principles, row 17 (DMBOK; this skill's status convention)