Recognises a hold scoped by system only
Scope lists systems, missing custodians' own stores.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 53% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 51% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 64% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 66% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The custodians and their stores
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: LH-001 scope: DMS and loan system; the advisor's personal drive missing Acceptable: Custodians first, then all their stores
Also known as: Scope by system only
Related knobits
Builds on
All 14 knobits of Apply legal holds and support e-discovery.
Source: Review checklist 04-legal-hold, row 3 (Sedona; EDRM)