Recognises permanent retention with no reason
"Permanent" with no justification.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 54% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 54% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 36% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 55% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The rule and a period or a stated reason
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: RR-006 payment instructions period: permanent Acceptable: 5 years after the transaction (AML) and 7 for vouchers (Acc), or a stated reason
Also known as: Permanent retention with no reason
Related knobits
Builds on
All 17 knobits of Set the retention and disposition schedule.
Source: Review checklist 02-retention-schedule, row 6 (GDPR; 15489)