Recognises an architecture principle with no rationale or implications
The statement alone: nobody can see why, or where it applies.
Can AI do this?
Not settled yet The benchmark tested this, but the models' answers do not settle yet whether they master it. 0 of 4 models in the current benchmark master it.
| Model | Tier | Probability of mastery | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-4-argon | Flagship | 57% | Not shown |
| gemini-3.5-flash-lite | Low cost | 49% | Not shown |
| gpt-6-luna | Low cost | 56% | Not shown |
| claude-haiku-5-5 | Low cost | 55% | Not shown |
Mastered means a probability of at least 90% that the model has this knobit, estimated from its graded answers. “Not shown” means the answers do not settle it either way. How the models are tested.
What it looks like in practice
Expected result: The principle and the missing parts
How it is assessed: Flags the deficient case and passes the acceptable one. Deficient: AP-005 "Reuse before buy before build", no rationale, implications: [] Acceptable: Rationale (cost and integration history) and implications ("a new application must show no existing one covers the need")
Also known as: Principle with no rationale or implications
Related knobits
Builds on
All 17 knobits of Frame stakeholder concerns and architecture principles.
Source: Review checklist 01-concerns-principles, row 6 (TOGAF)